data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3411/e3411832162afd18d700cc2ad73471f472e3556e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a040d/a040da4117a3913ac04b3a7e37ba7ffffd644e8d" alt=""
There is a similar occurence with the value of households improving again as it moves towards a steady state value. This can also be seen below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8313b/8313bbad47f86442491db2b8d8d65305b8d19ede" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5570d/5570dcfa8fa95e8df55182934a500111242b2e1f" alt=""
Now, if we were to change the value of alpha to 0.7 from 0.3, we can see that there is a negative effect on both the capital output ratio and the value of households.
For the value of u, there is a slight sudden increase however it gradually returns to its original value which is slightly less than if this change was not made, as can be seen graphically below.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e184/2e184fcb3ce7e14f902214e6a063ff94554f37b8" alt=""
For the value of households though, the reaction is that the value diminishes quite rapidly to zero which is not desirable in any case.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01912/01912452fcf7f93dbef89c1ab4a73d79dece861d" alt=""
1 comment:
Nice one. S
Post a Comment